Another favorite from this year that I find myself frequently passing along as a response to all kinds of hasty conclusions: Count to ten when a plane goes down
Still closing tabs. This story about efforts to make it easier for doctors to get licenses to practice in different states makes an interesting little study of irrationality in our intergovernmental system. Since state laws differ considerably, regulating legal practice at the state level makes some sense… but medicine?
I’m not good with bookmarks. Or with closing tabs.
The OneTab browser extension is thus a lifesaver. I’m working on paring down the 700 or so links I’ve built up over the last several months, though… and I’m running across a few things that I don’t entirely need to bookmark for frequent use, but also don’t want to lose. Blogging appropriate, right?
One is this map that links Virginian-Pilot archive and Norfolk Public Library collection photos to their geographic locations. So, for example, you can easily find a photo taken from the railroad trestle a block from here from circa 1924. Just cool.
I ran across this post this morning, citing a Media Matters study’s findings that only 9% of the evening cable news guests who are brought on camera to discuss education issues are educators. I shared without thinking too much. Nine percent, after all, sounds frightfully low.
But later in the morning, I got to thinking a little more. What IS the right stakeholder share here?
While the story in question is talking about media representation, this is a constant issue for public administration in a democracy. As I struggle to become an expert, finding ways to properly balance expertise and wider stakeholder opinion is one of the big questions to grapple with. I really like Tom Nichols’ piece, The Death of Expertise, and yet. How many of our talking heads about education should be teachers? And how many parents, and how many politicians and students and business leaders and researchers and concerned community members? How much weight to one set of perspectives is too much?
Maybe there’s another question, too: are any of these guests listening to each other, giving expertise weight where it’s deserved while balancing it against broader concerns?